Make AI attack its own draft 5×: the self-critique loop's blind spot
I don't read the first draft an AI writes. First I make the AI tear its own draft apart — up to five times — and I read what's left.
Concrete code, honest costs, real failures. We try things out for ourselves, then publish what we learned — prompts, scripts, and receipts included.
How Claude, Gemini, GPT and friends behave when we actually wire them into something — not just on a benchmark.
What a thing actually costs to run. Tokens, hosting, API minutes — broken out so you can decide for yourself.
When a bet doesn't work, we say so and show the math. The corrections matter more than the wins.
I don't read the first draft an AI writes. First I make the AI tear its own draft apart — up to five times — and I read what's left.
I handed the exact same one-line prompt to Claude, Gemini, and GPT — build a landing page for a fictional app called "PlantPing" — and compared them on design, code, and generation speed.
Both come from OpenAI. People assume Codex is just "ChatGPT for code." It isn't. I gave both the same real coding task — a small Python CLI called AskTube that fetches a YouTube transcript and summarizes it — and watched what each one shipped.